“… a little bloody …”

Posted on February 25, 2011
Filed Under Democratic Party, Progressives, Public Sector Union Greed | 1042Leave a Comment%22...+a+little+bloody+...%222011-02-26+02%3A51%3A15MikesView

I had updated one of my earlier postings, having to do with Democrat calls for ‘civility,’ following the Tuscon shooting tragedy, entitled ‘As Bush Derangement Morphs into Palin Derangement.’ I was updating that posting with almost daily uncivil actions by the left and figured that a few of those had made the point about communist, liberal progressive, leftist Democratic Party hypocrisy.

That was before this past Monday when a Democratic Party Congressman, essentially called for blood in the streets. My update to that previous post follows:

Update, 2/22/11: More left wing civility. Today, a Massachusetts Democrat Congressman, Rep. Mike Capuano, told a crowd of union supporters, “I’m proud to be here with people who understand that it’s more than just sending an email to get you going. Every once and awhile you need to get out on the streets and get a little bloody when necessary.” Well if that’s what the little limo riding, union hack wants, then that’s what he’ll get. He forgets that only 7% of non-government jobs are covered by their communist collective, called unions. That means that 93% aren’t in a union and some of us, that were in unions the past, have vivid memories of the way it was and apparently still is. As one that, in the early seventies, had a group of three enforcers start pushing me around a parking lot at 2:00 am, when I went on a break out to a lunch truck, I know exactly what the Congressman means. They showed up a week after they told me I was working too hard and to slow down. After they started punching, two of those enforcers left with bloody faces and the third ran away. So union management and enforcer pukes, I have no love for you. If you want some of the 93% of non-government job holders defending themselves, go ahead and, “… get a little bloody when necessary.” Greedy fools.

And so, the civil Democrat discourse continues in America.

By the way, in April, 2009, I posted this about the term ‘Democratic Party:’ http://kelley.us.com/editorial/blog1/?p=100